top of page
Pillars of Justice

Unit 3: Gun Control

Analytic Notes and Pre-Writing Steps

Pro #1: "Exploring the relationship between support for gun control measures and understanding of gun control"

​

Analytic Notes:

  • TV affects certain people more than others

  • women are more likely to want stronger gun control laws

  • gender, rural vs urban, southern vs non southern

  • hypothesis of high level of understanding = low level of support

  • average person has a moderate level of understanding gun control issues

  • index range from 1.87 to 4.07

  • people from rural areas tend to display a better understanding of gun control issues

  • people who are in pro gun groups and own guns have a better understanding

​

Pre-Writing Steps:

Audience: people wondering whether there's a correlation between supporting gun control and having an understanding of the implications of gun control

Purpose: to inform about correlations between different types of people and their understanding of gun control issues

Premise: understanding gun control issues

Powerful Quote: "caution should be used when attempting to extrapolate any results beyond the sample"

​

​

 

 Pro #2: "The NRA's Strict-Scrutiny Amendments"

​​

Analytic Notes:

  • "iron plating"

    • "judges are constitutionally obliged to evaluate gun restrictions under 'the highest standards of justification'"​

  • Alabama, Louisiana, Missouri, and Iowa have adopted/followed the NRA's proposal

  • "Tailor the language of their proposed"

  • convicted felons don't share the right to bear arms...or do they?

  • courts have rejected challenges to the 2nd Amendment

  • state and local officials are limited by their states constitutions in regards to state and local gun control measures

  • states must have laws that are reasonable regulations

    • constitutionally permissible

  • states using their "police power to protect the health, safety and morals of the citizenry" to impose gun regulations/reasonable regulations

    • Connecticut's ban on "assault weapons"

  • Louisiana prohibiting carrying concealed weapons

  • courts upholding gun restrictions

  • NRA's strict-scrutiny amendments cannot assure success

    • jud​ges will be scrutinizing their own "anti-gun activism"

​

Pre-Writing Steps:

Audience: people who want gun rights

Purpose: to question whether strict scrutiny amendments would be beneficial to gun owners

Premise: states already have their own gun restrictions which would only further limit guns with the NRA's strict scrutiny amendments

Powerful Quote: "tailor the language of their proposed"

​

​

​

​

Pro #3: "Seeking the Peace: Anti-Gun Violence"

​

Analytic Notes:

  • increasing and concerning boughs of gun violence in Pittsburgh

  • lack of black empowerment in Pittsburgh

  • prejudice and marginalization against Black and Native populations throughout Pittsburgh's history

  • black communities more often to be shot, harmed, or killed

  • shooters at 3 mass shootings in Pittsburgh were all white men 

  • mass casualty incident in April of 2022

  • police violence against Black individuals

  • Pittsburgh governor doesn't care about the Black community

  • insensitive state officials

  • mentalities towards gun violence

  • local political commitments to change

​

Pre-Writing Steps:

Audience: People against violence and prejudice directed towards Black communities

Purpose: To inform of the grievances the black community in Pittsburgh has faced. To demonstrate the ongoing reforms regarding gun violence.

Premise: Guns are being used against innocent members of society in Pittsburgh and changes need to happen

Powerful Quote: "where there is a failure to perceive a common humanity, it is a short step toward employment of  violence" 

​

​

​

Con #1: "The US Gun-Control Paradox: Gun Buyer Response to Congressional Gun-Control Initiatives"

​

Analytic Notes:

  • firearm deaths from 1980-2006 

    • 88 deaths daily​

  • 2nd leading cause of death = guns

  • increased gun ownership leads to increased firearm homicide

  • guns are easily accessible and legal

    • problems in the distribution system​

  • political environment revolving around guns has been increasingly divisive

  • pro-gun lobbying organizations

    • NRA: national rifle association

  • background checks do not regulate guns sold

  • buying guns increased after the Sandy Hook Incident

​

Pre-Writing Steps:

Audience: People interested in distribution or regulation of guns after the lack of regulation of firearms in the US

Purpose: to inform about the lack of regulation of firearms in the US

Premise: the distribution of firearms in the US isn't being regulated and is thus leading to further political divide

Powerful Quote: "the more advocates push for increased regulation to limit gun sales, the more guns that are sold" (Jones, Stone).

​

​

​

Con #2:"Firearm ownership, Defensive Gun Usage, and Support for Gun Control: Does Knowledge Matter?"

​

Analytic Notes:

  • relationship between 3 types of gun knowledge

    • gun crimes, gun legislation, gun functions​

  • 3 measures of gun control

    • general gun control, support of reducing gun ownership, support for keeping guns away from "at risk" people​

  • US homicide rate is 7x higher than other countries

  • guns used in crimes are often not fired but used for victim compliance

  • people part of the NRA believe that "more restrictive gun control will do little to reduce crime or to save lives"

  • US civilian gun ownership is the highest in the world

    • more than 350 million guns owned by Americans​

  • gun crimes committed by people who do not meet regulations

    • age, criminal record, etc​

  • belief that reducing number of guns in the market can reduce the number of guns available for crimes

  • firearm availability may increase lethality of violent crimes

  • most of general public want to ban manufacturing and possession of firearms such as assault rifles

    • some also want to ban handguns​

  • increased screening, monitoring buyers and dealers, national firearm database, outlawing secondary "straw" market purchases

  • 57% of Americans want to make gun laws stricter

    • support for background checks and limited access ​

  • men, white, politically conservative, rural communities, and gun owners are less supportive of restrictions

  • people familiar with firearms favor permissive forms

  • minority can BIPOC communities favor less restrictive gun control measures when criminal justice system is invovled

  • gun control threatens "male intimacy" and male identity

    • men are more immersed in gun culture​

  • 10% of gun owners in a study had no formal or informal training

    • ill-trained gun owners more at risk of using or storing firearms unsafely​

  • generally most gun owners take forms of precaution

  • proportion of defensive gun usage

    • guns used to protect life, liberty, and property​

  • removing guns from law abiding citizens can prevent citizens from protecting themselves

    • "viable protection mechanism"​

​

Pre-Writing Steps:

Audience: people concerned about gun rights/ownership

Purpose: conduct a study about gun owners and beliefs

Premise: limiting guns can be problematic to most Americans

Powerful Quote: "more restrictive gun control will do little to reduce crime or to save lives"

​

​

​

Con #3:  "The Extraordinary Ethics of Self-Defense: Embodied Vulnerability..."

​

Analytic Notes:

  • many people of all backgrounds use guns for defense when they are vulnerable

  • "Fear motivates them to become involved in a political fight"

  • safety in the presence of firearms

  • vulnerability politics

  • predominantly white organizations use vulnerability to justify gun rights

  • racial, gendered, and minority groups use vulnerability to justify gun rights

    • serve as contemporary gun rights groups​

  • white male gun owners using vulnerability only shows their desire to access deadly weaponry

  • "the gun becomes what one is, not what one has"

  • people of color owning guns leads to state violence

  • "whiteness affords full citizenship"

  • laws cannot protect queer Americans from prejudice

  • Pink Pistols shooting club in Massachusetts for LGBT community

  • LGBT community members feel as though guns are the only way to protect their community

  • private gun ownership should be defense for minority groups

​

Pre-Writing Steps:

Audience: people wondering where the limits of self defense are in regards to guns

Purpose: to inform about the importance of gun ownership to minority groups

Premise: Guns are important in regards to defending minorities and groups subject to prejudice or violent crimes

Powerful Quote: "Fear motivates them"

​

​

Con #4: "Race-gender bias in white Americans’ preferences for gun availability"

 

Analytic Notes:

  • Availability of firearms has been racialized and gendered

  • Studies about the availability of firearms has only targeted White Americans

  • “No study has examined how the race or gender of a firearm’s possessor shapes attitudes over availability”

  • race/racial threat determines how white Americans change their preferences of firearm availability

  • Experiment of how white Americans change preference if a gun owner is black or a woman

  • Complicated role of identity

  • Odd choices made by interest groups advocating for gun availability

  • NRA’s silence following killing of Philando Castile

    • Black man legally carrying a gun

    • Shot to death by police officer during traffic stop

  • “Gun culture” and “cultural cognition”

  • “Pre-existing cultural commitments”

  • Gun policy laws don’t target specific demographic groups but guns are often associated with white americans

    • Hinders ability to find patterns of gender or race bias

  • Expected white Americans to most support white women owning guns and least support black men owning guns

  • Group threat 

    • White backlash against black Americans when they “pose threats” to society

  • Historical stereotypes

  • Racialization of policies and gendered policies

    • Shift in white attitude towards black

  • Women stereotypes make them seem as less of a threat than men

  • Women owning guns reinforce female vulnerability

  • Support for firearm ownership increases for women

  • White women more likely to be a target of sexism than black women

  • Concluded that gun policy is still deeply racial

  • White respondents much less likely to support Black gun owners

  • “Dynamic of race and gender”

  • Policy attitudes influenced by who will be most affected

    • Support varies due to race and gender

​

Pre-Writing Steps:

Audience: individuals interested in seeing whether race or gender will have an influence on gun policies

Purpose: to inform about how racialized and gendered policies will impact gun control laws

Premise: white Americans are not likely to support black gun owners

Key Quote: “race and gender primes still figure prominently into gun control attitudes” (Hayes, Fortunato, Hibbing 2021)

​

​

​

Con #5: "Racial and ethnic differences in the effects of state firearm laws: a systematic review subgroup analysis"

​

Analytic Notes:

  • Firearm policies have continuously tried to deny Black americans firearm access

  • “Racial and ethnic disparities in violent victimization and premature mortality”

  • Conducted research studies to examine how Black americans would be affected by gun laws

  • Black americans are more likely to face firearm violence

    • Could be more protected with gun laws

  • Laws could be structured to protect white americans

    • Less benefits for black americans

  • “For decades, the USA has underinvested in firearm violence and firearm policy research”

 

Pre-Writing Steps:

Audience: People wondering if firearm policies will affect minority groups

Purpose: To find the relationship between 8 determined outcomes and firearm policies

Premise: to determine whether firearm policies benefit or harm racial and ethnic groups

Key Quote: “For decades, the USA has underinvested in firearm violence and firearm policy research” (Smart 2023)

​

​

​

Con #6: "Disparities in Policing From Theory to Practice"

​

Analytic Notes:

  • Police using force on POC

  • Lack of trust between communities and law enforcement

  • Major-minority communities

    • Higher levels of crime lead to more police encounters

    • Increases amount of fatal outcomes

    • Lower income communities more likely to experience social control

    • “Black people and Hispanic people, are more likely to be subjected to more intense law enforcement practices than white people”

  • Conflict theory of law

    • Policing enforces social control

    • Only benefits those in power

    • Higher populations of POC are more likely to have larger police force due to fear by whites

  • Minority threat hypothesis-group threat theory

    • Minority groups see more intense and aggressive policing because they are seen as being threatening

    • “These groups are seen as threatening the established order and power structure”

  • police more likely to use force in areas that are economically disadvantaged

  • black people in suburbs were 4.5x more likely to be arrested than white people

  • injuries caused by sheriffs departments show to be more lethal than local police departments

​

Pre-Writing Steps:

Audience: people interested about police violence against minority groups

Purpose: to conduct research about the relationship between minority groups and law enforcement

Premise: there is a long history of racism and discrimination which has negatively affected minority groups--most especially Black and Hispanic people.

Key Quote: "Multiple studies have consistently shown that racial/ethnic minorities...are more likely to be subjected to more intense law enforcement practices than White people" (Zarre 2024).

​

​

​

Con #7: "Ten Years After Oak Creek: Federal Policy Recommendations to Protect Communities Targeted by Hate"

​

Analytic Notes:

  • attack on Sikh temple in Wisconsin

  • hate against AAPI community in 2022

  • mass shootings in Atlanta and Indianapolis

  • anti-Sikh sentiment after 9/11

  • covid-19 hate crimes act

    • lack of action by federal lawmakers​

  • communities have done their part --> lawmakers need to do their part

  • pushes for US government to take action against violence against minority communities

    • re-introducing domestic terrorism prevention act​

    • "current U.S. law prohibits the Department of Justice (DOJ) from prosecuting hate crimes where bias is not the sole reason for a perpetrator's actions" (Narang 2023)

​

Pre-Writing Steps:

Audience: Lawmakers and politicians in government

Purpose: to push for more preventative measures in regard to the justice system on violence against minority groups

Premise: government needs to make reforms to prevent the amount of mass killings in the US

Key Quote: "Only that change of mindset will determine if the safety of religious minorities, communitites of color, and women will be prioritized, and whether our communities will be spared from having to bear further painful commemorations" (Narang 2023)

​

​

​

Con #8: "Framing the Second Amendment: Gun Rights, Civil Rights and Civil Liberties"

​

Analytic Notes:

  • "historical relationship between race and arms"

  • gun rights connected to equality and racial equality

  • "Black Guns Matter"

  • anti-tyranny values

  • constitutional culture

  • discovering the meaning behind the 2nd amendment and how different types of Americans interpret the 2nd amendment

  • framing of 2nd amendment has greatly affected gun debates

  • fear of governmental disarmament

  • NRA believes that the 2nd amendment saves Americans from 'oblivion'

  • the NRA has polarized gun control and gun rights

  • NRA believe that any form of gun control threatens the 2nd amendment

​

Pre-Writing Steps:

Audience: Americans concerned about the 2nd amendment and gun policies

Purpose: to discover how gun rights activists are interpreting the 2nd amendment

Premise: how the framing of the 2nd amendment influences future policies and future debates of gun control

Key Quote: "Although most gun owners accept some limits on the right to keep and bear arms, fringe groups, milities, and other uncompromising advocated have dominated the civil liberties framing of the Second Amendment"

​

​

​

Con #9: "Racially Disparate Policy Responses to Mass Shootings"

​

Analytic Notes:

  • gun policies left to the states

  • episodic changes

  • victim identities heavily influencing efforts and policy responses

  • NRA pushes racialized narratives

    • narratives that policies are protecting racial groups and threatening white Americans

    • forcing politicians to not intervene in gun control​

  • when white communities are affected then gun control is used to protect them

  • gun policy diverges from public opinion

  • legislatures influenced by implicit biases

    • more likely to support gun restrictions when victims are white​

  • firearm policies are responsive to mass shootings when the victims involved are white

  • 10 white fatalities--> 1-1.1 more gun laws

  • 10 racial/ethnic fatalities --> .6 fewer gun laws

  • gun control interest groups increase lobbying when there are white fatalities

  • "mass shooting fatalities of color do not significantly influence interest groups' lobbying efforts" (Markarian 2022)

  • involvement of race in gun policy

  • disarmament of people of color whilst still keeping guns for whites

  • politicians change "who is seen as the primary beneficiaries of a policy"

  • white Americans support gun restriction when they see whites as gun violence victims

​

Pre-Writing Steps:

Audience: individuals concerned about how gun restrictions will affect different ethnic groups of people in America

Purpose: to inform about the racialized narratives that revolve around gun control and gun rights

Premise: white Americans are more likely to implement restrictive gun laws when white victims are involved

Key Quote: "White Americans are framed as the primary beneficiaries of gun control, leading to increased support for restrictive gun laws among co-ethnics" (Markarian 2022)

​

Labeled Reading Journals

Grace Moua

English 2105

Professor Dr. Gill

Pro #1 

20 February 2024

"The Best Writing is Rewriting": 3 Draft(s), 1 Mentor (Elianna Aragon)

Works Cited

 

Moriarty, Laura J., and John E. Hearne. "Exploring the relationship between support for gun control measures and understanding of gun control issues." Journal of Security Administration, vol. 21, no. 1, 1998, pp. 12-27. ProQuest, http://proxy.library.cpp.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/exploring-relationship-between-support-gun/docview/195765288/se-2.

Key Quote: "it is impossible to say that understanding of gun control issues causes individuals not to support gun ownership" (Moriarty, Hearne 1998)

​

(Provocative Title) The Americans Owning Guns Know Better

 

          (Unity/Topic Sentence) In a study conducted by Laura J. Moriarty and John E. Hearne, it was discovered that the Americans who owned guns knew more about gun control issues than non-gun owners. (Adequate Development/Body) Americans who own guns having more knowledge about gun control issues demonstrates the complexity of supporting ownership and restrictions. Many people believe that gun owners care only for their rights to owning a gun rather than the lives at risk. In contrast however, many gun owners are in fact knowledgeable and demonstrate having a higher level of understanding in regards to gun control issues (Moriarty, Hearne 1998). Moriarty and Hearne's research resulted in the conclusion that gun owners aren't ignorant to the implications brought with gun control laws. (Coherence/Conclusion) Whilst Moriarty and Hearne acknowledged that the study conducted couldn't have included all confounding variables revolving gun control issues, the study effectively showed that gun owning Americans are in fact knowledgeable about issues revolving gun control.

​

​

​

Grace Moua

English 2105

Professor Dr. Gill

Pro #2 

26 February 2024

"The Best Writing is Rewriting": 2 Draft(s), 1 Mentor (Elianna Aragon)

Works Cited

 

Pettys, Todd E. "The N.R.A.'s Strict-Scrutiny Amendments." Iowa Law Review, vol. 104, no. 3, 2019, pp. 1455-1482. ProQuest, http://proxy.library.cpp.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/n-r-s-strict-scrutiny-amendments/docview/2212658368/se-2.

Key Quote: "tailor the language of their proposed" (Pettys 2019)

​

(Provocative Title) The NRA Pushes States to Implement Gun Restrictions

 

          (Unity/Topic Sentence) In an interesting turn of events, the National Rifle Association known as the NRA has been pushing state courts to implement gun restrictions. (Adequate Development/Body) The NRA pushed for states and judges to "evaluate gun restrictions under "the highest standards of justification"" which may have been initially pushed for self-benefit. The NRA's statement fails to take into consideration the fact that the state courts they are encouraging to evaluate gun restrictions will in fact be evaluating gun restrictions but not the lessening of said restrictions. State courts have instead been using their state laws to further impose "reasonable regulations" with statements of how the states will be utilizing their "police power to protect the health, safety and morals of the citizenry" (Pettys 2019). With the use of police power, states such as Louisiana have prohibited concealed weapons and Connecticut has banned assault weapons. The NRA most likely didn't expect states to be using their statement to ban and prohibit the use of guns. Regardless, the NRA asked states and judges the NRA claimed to be "anti-gun" to evaluate gun restrictions and the states did so. (Coherence/Conclusion) Overall, Petty's article proposed an interesting perspective of the NRA pushing states to implement gun restrictions.

​

​

​

​

Grace Moua

English 2105

Professor Dr. Gill

Pro #3 

26 February 2024

"The Best Writing is Rewriting": 2 Draft(s), 1 Mentor (Elianna Aragon)

Works Cited

 

Smith, R. D., and John C. Welch. "Seeking the Peace: Anti-Gun Violence Cadres, Concepts, and Connections in Pittsburgh." Society, vol. 60, no. 1, 2023, pp. 54-67. ProQuest, http://proxy.library.cpp.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/seeking-peace-anti-gun-violence-cadres-concepts/docview/2780587023/se-2, doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-022-00783-z.

Key Quote: "Where there is a failure to perceive a common humanity, it is a short step toward employment of violence" (Smith, Welch 2023)

​

(Provocative Title) Racial Attacks in Pittsburgh Proves Change is Needed

 

          (Unity/Topic Sentence) Throughout Pittsburgh's history, there has been many horrendous incidents of targeted attacks towards the Black community and change is desperately needed. (Adequate Development/Body) R. D. Smith and John C. Welch bring concern over the horrendous use of guns on innocent members of society and how changes need to happen. There has been increasing and concerning amounts of gun violence in Pittsburgh over the last decade which concerns many in the Black community who feel as though there is a lack of Black empowerment by state government. Prejudice and marginalization against Black and Native populations have occurred all throughout Pittsburgh's history yet it continues to exist in recent times with a mass shooting occurring in just April of 2022 (Smith, Welch 2023). Whilst there have been some alterations in Pittsburgh's laws following George Floyd and the Black Lives Matter movement, the Pittsburgh government has yet to demonstrate full support for the black community. Restricting guns or placing regulations on guns would be able to save the Black community from the hardships caused by unnecessary hate. (Coherence/Conclusion) Overall, the racial attacks in Pittsburgh towards the Black community shows the need for state governments to stand up for their communities.

​

​

​

​

Grace Moua

English 2105

Professor Dr. Gill

Con #1 

20 February 2024

"The Best Writing is Rewriting": 3 Draft(s), 1 Mentor (Elianna Aragon)

Works Cited

 

Jones, Michael A., and George W. Stone. "The U.S. Gun-Control Paradox: Gun Buyer Response To Congressional Gun-Control Initiatives." Journal of Business & Economics Research (Online), vol. 13, no. 4, 2015, pp. 167. ProQuest, http://proxy.library.cpp.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/u-s-gun-control-paradox-buyer-response/docview/1722651790/se-2, doi:https://doi.org/10.19030/jber.v13i4.9449.

Key Quote: "the more advocates push for increased regulation...the more guns that are sold" (Jones, Stone 2015)

​

(Provocative Title) Restrictions on Guns Encourage Americans to Purchase More

 

          (Unity/Topic Sentence) It is expected that restrictions on guns and the gun market would discourage Americans from purchasing firearms however doing so only encourages Americans to purchase more. (Adequate Development/Body) In research done by Michael A. Jones and George W. Stone, it was found that Americans felt more encouraged to purchase guns after the Sandy Hook incident. Jones and Stone found that there were practically no regulations of the firearm market which encouraged Americans to purchase more guns following a mass shooting which included the lives of innocent children (Jones, Stone 2015). It is the lack of restrictions and regulation of guns that fails to discourage Americans from purchasing more. (Coherence/Conclusion) Overall, the lack of restrictions on the firearm market has only encouraged Americans to purchase more guns.

​

​

​

​

Grace Moua

English 2105

Professor Dr. Gill

Con #2 

26 February 2024

"The Best Writing is Rewriting": 2 Draft(s), 1 Mentor (Elianna Aragon)

Works Cited

 

Kruis, Nathan E., et al. "Firearm Ownership, Defensive Gun Usage, and Support for Gun Control: Does Knowledge Matter?" American Journal of Criminal Justice : AJCJ, vol. 48, no. 1, 2023, pp. 21-50. ProQuest, http://proxy.library.cpp.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/firearm-ownership-defensive-gun-usage-support/docview/2775137451/se-2, doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-021-09644-7.

Key Quote: "more restrictive gun control will do little to reduce crime or to save lives" (Kruis 2023)

​

(Provocative Title) Unqualified Gun Users Threaten America's Safety

 

          (Unity/Topic Sentence) Many Americans often blame gun owners for the horrific attacks of violence seen through gun use yet those same Americans fail to see that it is the unqualified gun users who threaten America's safety. (Adequate Development/Body) In research and study done by Nathan E. Kruis, he found that many gun crimes are committed by unqualified Americans who do not meet the regulations. Those unqualified gun users are often under aged or hold previous criminal records. Additionally, it was discovered that 10% of the gun owners in Kruis' study had no formal or informal gun training (Kruis 2023). Ill-trained gun owners are at a greater risk of improperly using and storing their firearms thus threatening America's safety. Many Americans support limiting the sale of firearms or enacting stricter regulations such as increased screening of buyers and sellers however these regulations fail to address the unqualified gun users who continue get access to dangerous firearms. Increasing the regulations would only further entice unqualified Americans into using guns without proper training or knowledge. Kruis emphasized how gun control threatens "male intimacy" and male identity which would only lead to more unqualified individuals wanting to improperly handle firearms. (Coherence/Conclusion) Imposing harsher regulations on the buying and selling of firearms is an understandable want of Americans however, those same regulations would only encourage more unqualified Americans into improperly using firearms and thus putting America's safety at risk.

​

​

​

​

Grace Moua

English 2105

Professor Dr. Gill

Con #3 

26 February 2024

"The Best Writing is Rewriting": 2 Draft(s), 1 Mentor (Elianna Aragon)

Works Cited

 

Anderson, Joe. "The Extraordinary Ethics of Self-Defence: Embodied Vulnerability and Gun Rights among Transgender Shooters in the United States." Ethnos, vol. 88, no. 5, 2023, pp. 1036-1053. ProQuest, http://proxy.library.cpp.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/extraordinary-ethics-self-defence-embodied/docview/2894070112/se-2, doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2021.2013281.

Key Quote: "Fear motivates them to become involved in a political fight" (Anderson 2023)

​

(Provocative Title) Vulnerable Minorities Need Guns

 

          (Unity/Topic Sentence) It is commonly known that minority groups are more likely to encourage stricter gun laws however, vulnerable minorities actually need guns. (Adequate Development/Body) In an article written by Joe Anderson, he brings a unique perspective to gun rights in regard to minority groups needing guns to feel safe during times of vulnerability. Anderson depicts many real-life instances of people of color or people from the LGBTQ community who fear for their lives and look to guns as a form of self-defense. By limiting gun access, the ability for these minority groups to feel safe whether it be merely walking down a busy street or going out with friends depletes immensely. Anderson even speaks of the Pink Pistols which is a shooting club in Massachusetts specifically for the LGBTQ community following the mass shooting at an LGBTQ night club in Orlando, Florida (Anderson 2023). Groups like the Pink Pistols wouldn't be able to give support and provide comfort to members of the LGBTQ community if gun restrictions were to increase. Additionally, laws cannot protect queer Americans or people of color from prejudice thus, guns serve as a form of protection for these communities. (Coherence/Conclusion) All in all, it is not only the stereotypical white male who wants to maintain gun rights but it is also all of the vulnerable minority groups who need guns for protection.

Final Gun Control ACAR Paper

Full Argumentative Research Paper Gun Control Model

Grace Moua

Professor Dr. Gill

English 2105

“The Best Writing is Rewriting”: 2 Draft(s), Teacher Conferences, Peer Mentors, 12 scholarly sources were used to inform divided stasis and three supports for this rhetor’s main claim

Key Quote: “Fear motivates them to become involved in a political fight” (Anderson 2023)

 

(Expert’s Provocative Title) The Extraordinary Ethics of Self-Defense: Embodied Vulnerability and Gun Rights among Transgender Shooters in the United States

 

ACAR Introduction Paragraph

 

          (Hook) Americans often believe that supporters of gun rights are solely heterosexual white men yet Joe Anderson, a research fellow at the University of Edinburgh, argues that “owning firearms is one way that Americans from diverse backgrounds can claim an embodied sovereignty over their own safety” (Anderson).  (Bridge) Anderson’s message to Americans is about the importance of gun rights for minority groups such as members of the LGBTQ community. (Divided Stasis/Thesis Sentence) (Opponents Claim) Although opponents of gun rights claim that firearms are the leading cause for violence against minority groups, (Rhetor’s Main Claim) firearms actually provide safety and security for victims of harassment because (Reason/Support 1) minority groups use firearms for self-defense (Anderson),  (Reason/Support 2) shooting groups for minorities builds supportive communities (Anderson), and (Reason/Support 3) minority gun owners challenge the conservative gun right organizations which consist of heterosexual white men (Anderson).

 

Narration Paragraph

 

          (Narration) In June of 2016, the debate of maintaining gun rights for Americans gained more attention following a mass shooting at an LGBT nightclub in Orlando, Florida which resulted in the creation of the Pink Pistols shooting club. The new shooting club would then move on to be advocates for gun rights as they argue how “all people have the right to defend themselves from harm and everyone has an individual right to bear arms as protected by the 2nd Amendment” (Pink Pistols 2015). Without the protection of firearms, minority groups are vulnerable to violence and harassment perpetrated by fellow Americans. Proponents of maintaining gun rights are most often white men however minority groups are also advocating for gun rights since firearms provide forms of protection and self defense. Critics of gun rights associations and shooting clubs believe that allowing firearms is only going to result in more violence amongst America. What these critics fail to realize is that restricting guns will restrict minority groups from protection as there is a high likelihood that new gun laws will be structured to protect white Americans. 

 

Confirmation Paragraph

 

          (Confirmation) Keeping gun rights has allowed minority groups to maintain protection from violence which may appear through harassment or assault since gun control laws often negatively impact minorities. As Mathew Hayes, David Fortunato, and Mathew V. Hibbing state in “Race-gender bias in white Americans’ preferences for gun availability”, it was discovered that “race and gender primes still figure prominently into gun control attitudes” (Hayes, Fortunato, Hibbing 2021). Implementing more gun control laws would only further restrict minority groups from having the same protection as their white counterparts. Overall, throughout his article’s examples, Joe Anderson highlights how important it is for impacted minority groups to maintain their gun rights due to the importance of self protection.

 

Concession/Refutation Paragraph: Main Claim + Support 1 Paragraph

 

          (Concession/Refutation) It is indeed true that many Americans oppose granting or maintaining gun rights as they argue that guns bring more harm than good. (Scholarly Source 1) Todd Pettys, a faculty member of the of University of Iowa College of Law and enthusiast of the Constitution, points out how “the job of ascertaining the scope of the strongly protected fundamental right to keep and bear arms will fall to judges–the very judges some people whose purported “anti-gun activism” the N.R.A. says necessitates these amendments in the first place” (Pettys 2019). Pettys claims that gun support groups such as the National Rifle Association are unknowingly supporting gun control laws by encouraging judges who support gun control to determine the scope of the second amendment. (Scholarly Source 2) Other proponents of gun control such as professor Laura Moriarty and shooting instructor John Hearne argue that “gun owners, hunters, and members of a pro-gun group possess a better understanding of gun control issues” (Moriarty, Hearne 1998). Moriarty and Hearne point out how supporters of gun rights actually understand the reasons and implications behind the push for more gun laws. (Scholarly Source 3) Additionally, opponents of gun rights argue that guns bring more harm than good since “unarmed black men were four times more likely to be killed by police than unarmed white men” (Fox 2019, Smith 2023). Fox and Smith both point out the violence caused by firearms in the United States even when the firearms are in the hands of those who are supposed to protect. (Refutation: Rhetor’s Main Claim + Support 1) However, it is the minority groups who are at the greatest disadvantage in regards to gun control laws as factors such as race are highly tied into the history and lawmaking of gun control policies. (Toulmin Warrant) Ignoring the importance of equal representation for all Americans especially in regards to rights would destroy the trust in government. (Scholarly Source 1) Research fellow Joe Anderson argues for maintaining gun rights for minority groups, seeing as “whiteness affords full citizenship “ (Anderson 2023). Anderson’s statement is meant to provoke Americans especially since he touches on White privilege that minorities will never be granted even in the nation that prides itself on equality for all. (Scholarly Source 2) Mathew Hayes, David Fortunato, and Mathew Hibbing all point out the racism in gun availability preferences when stating how “the availability of firearms in the United States have been racialised at least since the prohibition of gun ownership for both free and enslaved Black Americans “ (Hayes, Fortunato, Hibbing 2021). Hayes, Fortunato, and Hibbing also address the inequality of gun rights for people of color–most especially Black Americans. (Scholarly Source 3) Rosanna Smart continues to acknowledge the racial disparity in firearm policies as she emphasizes how they “ have historical underpinnings rooted in efforts to deny Black people equal access to firearms “ (Smart 2023). The United States has shown to continuously restrict the rights of Black Americans. (Conclusion) From the research analyzed above, gun rights and gun control measures represent the highly intricate involvement of inequality and racism in the United States.

 

Refutation: Support 2 Paragraph

 

          (Refutation: Support 2) Implementing gun control measures is futile as Americans will continue to find ways to access firearms. (Toulmin Warrant) Making what is a constitutional right unconstitutional would deny Americans their natural inalienable rights. (Scholarly Source 1) Professors George Stone and Michael Jones both point out how pointless gun control laws are as they state how “the more advocates push for increased regulation to limit gun sales, the more guns that are sold” (Jones, Stone 2015). Jones and Stone’s message is that Americans will only want what they cannot have thus preventing the sale of guns will only lead to more problems such as an increase in illegal sales and trade of firearms. (Scholarly Source 2) Gun control laws are often placed with the intent of preventing misuse however they only further entice unqualified individuals into wanting to purchase and use firearms. Nathan Kruis et al. points out how “ill-trained gun owners may be at a greater risk of using their firearms in an unsafe manner or storing them in ways that permit “unauthorized” persons to access and use their weapons” (Kruis et al. 2020). Kruis’ argument demonstrates how easy it is for unqualified or “unauthorized” people to access firearms regardless of the amount of gun control measures. (Scholarly Source 3) Most often, the loudest voice against gun control is that of the National Rifle association. Timothy Zick addresses how the NRA and many other groups have polarized the discussion of gun control and gun rights when speaking of how “fringe groups, militias, and other uncompromising advocates have dominated the civil liberties framing of the Second Amendment” (Zick 2020). Zick’s argument is that Americans will not back down when their rights and liberties are being threatened thus, Americans will refuse to allow their guns to be controlled and taken away. (Conclusion) From the above information, attempting to implement gun control measures will be futile as Americans will only continue to find access to firearms because owning guns is an American’s inalienable right. 

 

Refutation: Support 3 Paragraph

 

          (Refutation: Support 3) Minority groups will continue to be targets and victims of hate and violence even with the enforcement of stricter gun control measures. (Toulmin Warrant) Stricter gun control measures won’t be effective since they won’t prevent acts of hate or violence against minorities. (Scholarly Source 1) Hossein Zare addresses the inequality of treatment minority groups face from law enforcement especially when stating how “multiple studies have consistently shown that racial/ethnic minorities…are more likely to be subjected to more intense law enforcement practices than White people” (Zare 2024). Zare is pointing out how bias is negatively affecting such a large population of the United States as law enforcement, the people who are meant to provide safety and protection, are instead implementing violence onto innocent racial and ethnic minority groups. (Scholarly Source 2) Nimarta Narang also addresses the failure of those meant to protect when she speaks of how “current U.S. law prohibits the Department of Justice from prosecuting hate crimes where bias is not the sole reason for a perpetrator’s actions” (Narang 2023). Following the massive amounts of acts of hate against the AAPI community, Narang puts an emphasis on the lack of action taken by federal lawmakers. Federal lawmakers are considering the importance of gun control yet they fail to address the greater underlying issues of hate acts and racism towards racial and ethnic groups. (Scholarly Source 3) G. Agustin Markarian, a researcher of American politics and legislation points out how gun control laws are only implemented as a means to benefit White Americans when stating how “White Americans are framed as the primary beneficiaries of gun control, leading to increased support for restrictive gun laws among co-ethnics” (Markarian 2024). Markarian is explaining how gun control laws are only implemented when White Americans are threatened which then leads to restricting gun rights to minorities however that same tactic never occurs vice versa. The systemic racism revolving around the topic of gun control and gun rights will always negatively affect minority groups and positively affect White Americans. (Conclusion) From the information provided above, it can be concluded that gun control won’t be able to effectively address the larger problem of hate crimes and racism in the United States.

 

Summation Paragraph

 

          (Summation: Argue that your stance on the issue is best for society) The debate of gun control and gun rights is highly controversial and difficult to digest for the average American especially when taking into consideration the massive amounts of underlying problems of systemic racism and bias within the United States. Gun control laws are heavily intertwined with racist views and hate against minority groups hence the reason why gun rights should continue to exist as a form of equality for said minority groups. Based on the information provided, gun rights have shown to be both a form of protection and a representation of America’s belief of equality for all people of color. If America is to represent true equality, there should be equality in the constitutional rights for all Americans, not just White Americans.

bottom of page